We all do it -- ogle over the astrophotographs by the masters. The images look
so exquisite with their masses of detail and perfectly round, pinpoint stars. We
know they didn't come easily.
Impressive celestial photography is a lot more feasible for amateurs now than it
was a generation ago. But good results still require a willingness to learn the
intricacies of cameras, focusing techniques, exposure times, films, and
miscellaneous equipment. In particular, taking deep-sky pictures requires a
skill that's involved in no other kind of photography: guiding on a star.
WHY GUIDE?
To get a sharp image from a long exposure, you must keep a guidestar centered on
cross hairs for the entire time the shutter is open -- from a few minutes to an
hour or more. While watching the star, you frequently need to adjust the
telescope's aim a bit to keep the image motionless on the film.
No telescope drive, no matter how well made, can eliminate the need for guiding.
Any gear system contains some *periodic error* that shifts the telescope back
and forth slightly in right ascension, typically with a period of 4, 8, or 15
minutes. If the telescope is not perfectly polar aligned it will probably drift
slightly in declination too. The telescope tube may flex a little as it tracks
the subject across the sky. Atmospheric refraction varies as an object's
altitude changes, altering the object's apparent position enough to blur
photographs after as little as a few minutes. The electricity running the drive
motor may be slightly irregular. And the slowest component of atmospheric
"seeing," or turbulence, can make a whole star field creep around slightly with
a characteristic time of many seconds. You have to guide the telescope on a star
to follow all of these motions.
The aiming corrections required are so tiny -- just a few arcseconds -- that you
cannot push the telescope by hand. Instead you need an electronic *drive
corrector* that speeds or slows the telescope's drive motor. This allows fine
guiding in right ascension (east-west), where the most frequent corrections are
needed.
You also need a fine-motion control in declination (north-south). A turn-by-hand
control will work only if the mounting is rigid enough so it doesn't wiggle at
high power when you turn the knob. An electric declination motor usually gives
much better results. Typically the buttons or joystick for controlling both
right ascension and declination are mounted on a hand paddle.
GETTING STARTED
The first thing you need to do is polar align your mount. This means aligning
the right-ascension axis parallel to the Earth's axis of rotation. Otherwise,
even with perfect guiding, everything in the photograph will circle slightly
around your guidestar, a problem known as field rotation.
How much polar alignment do you need? That depends on the exposure time and
image scale of the picture you are taking. Wide-field photography with a normal
(50-millimeter) camera lens requires minimal alignment. Simply pointing the
mount's polar axis at Polaris as best as you can judge is usually enough for
normal-lens exposures of a few minutes.
When you start using longer lenses or a telescope, you need better alignment.
Some mounts come with a *polar alignment finder,* a miniature telescope with an
engraved reticle that you position on Polaris and surrounding stars. These
devices work quickly and well. If you want the best possible alignment, however,
especially for a permanently mounted telescope, use the *declination drift
method* described in the box below. It takes a little time, but it's simple and
needs no special equipment. Nothing else gets you closer to the celestial pole.
PIGGYBACK PHOTOGRAPHY
The easiest way to enter the realm of deep-sky astrophotography is by the
piggyback method. Simply attach a camera to the side of the telescope, point
skyward, and open the shutter. You guide the camera by tracking on a star seen
in the telescope.
Piggyback photography puts the least demands on your guiding ability. Most
piggyback photographers start with a normal or a wide-angle lens (such as 28 mm)
that will capture whole constellations at once. Almost any camera lens has a
much shorter focal length than the telescope, so the image scale is much
smaller. This means you can make numerous small guiding mistakes without
affecting the photograph. Piggybacking provides just the type of practice you
need to gain experience for other, more difficult forms of astrophotography.
GUIDING EYEPIECES
What kind of eyepiece do you need for watching the guidestar? For piggyback
guiding you can try a plain high-power eyepiece with no cross hairs or reticle.
Simply rack a bright guidestar far out of focus until it almost fills the field
of view. Any substantial drift will be easily visible, allowing you to recenter
the star.
For photography at longer focal lengths, you need an eyepiece with an
illuminated reticle or cross hairs. Dozens of guiding eyepieces are on the
market, and many perform other functions as well. What do you really need?
Some people feel that the best design is still the old-fashioned cross hairs.
Any motion is revealed when the star emerges from behind their intersection.
Some astrophotographers like to keep the star in view, tucked adjacent to the
intersection. If you use a double or dual cross hair, the guidestar can be
placed at any of the four intersection points or defocused to nearly fill the
small central square.
Another approach is to use an eyepiece reticle with concentric circles, each
denoting a different guiding tolerance. If you can keep the star inside the
appropriate circle, you know that all is well. For this approach to work,
however, you have to know the guiding tolerance for your particular photographic
setup and which circle on the reticle this corresponds to. Guiding tolerances
are usually very tight, so most astrophotographers simply prefer to guide as
accurately as they possibly can and hope it's good enough.
One often overlooked approach is AstronomyOutreach Networkion reticle. This device superposes
a reticle's image onto the view in an ordinary eyepiece. Some designs have a 3X
Barlow lens built in to allow the use of medium-power eyepieces that have
comfortable eye relief. Another advantage is that the reticle's image can be
moved around the field to align on a guidestar; you don't have to move the
whole telescope to the star. This allows more flexibility in aiming and
composing your photographs.
Reticle illuminators today are a vast improvement over the incandescent bulbs
with their tangles of wires that were the rule in the past. Today's standard
illuminator is a dim, red LED (light-emitting diode) that draws only a little
current from a small battery that's right inside the eyepiece unit itself. The
brightness should be adjustable so you can set it to the best level for any
guidestar. One of the latest and greatest improvements is the blinking LED,
which gives you alternate views of the guidestar with and without the cross
hairs. This allows much fainter stars to be used for guiding.
THROUGH THE TELESCOPE
When it comes to deep-sky photography through a telescope, you have two choices:
using a separate guidescope or an off-axis guider.
A *guidescope* attaches to the main telescope via mounting rings that allow it
to be aimed independently to some degree. This lets you choose any guidestar up
to a couple of degrees from the field being photographed. As a rule of thumb,
the guidescope should have about as long a focal length as the telescope you are
photographing through. It should also have a reasonably large aperture. Such a
guidescope is a substantial instrument in its own right, adding a lot to the
whole setup's cost, size, weight, and demands on the mounting.
Guidescopes have another problem: flexure. During an exposure the guidescope
must not bend, shift, or otherwise change orientation with respect to the main
telescope's optical axis. Neither can anything in the main telescope bend or
shift. Otherwise stars will come out elongated, double, or irregular even when
you guide perfectly.
For such reasons the guidescope has been largely eclipsed in the last 20 years
by the *off-axis guider.* This device allows you to look through the main
telescope at the same time you're photographing through it.
Off-axis guiders generally use a little "pick-off" prism to divert a small part
of the image to the guiding eyepiece. The pick-off prism is near or outside the
edge of the camera frame, so its shadow has little or no effect on the
photograph. You maneuver the prism around to find a good guidestar before
starting the exposure. Alternatively, some guiders use a full-aperture window
called a pellicle that transmits most of the light to the film while reflecting
10 or 20 percent to the eyepiece.
At long focal lengths, off-axis guiding gives the best results. The starlight
you see in the eyepiece goes through the same optical assembly, by and large, as
the light going to the film, so tube flexure ceases to be an issue. If it
happens you just guide it out.
There are, however, a few inconveniences to consider. Finding a guidestar can be
tough, because the area of the field accessible to the pick-off prism is
limited. The guiding eyepiece extends out at a 90-degree angle to the light path
of the telescope, and to find a good star you may have to rotate the eyepiece
holder around the optical axis to an inconvenient angle. (Some new off-axis
guiders allow the eyepiece holder to be rotated independently of the camera.)
Focusing is another consideration. To focus, aim at a bright object, look
through the camera's viewfinder, and turn the focus knob until the image seen
through the camera is as sharp as you can get it. Leave everything right there.
To focus the guiding eyepiece, slide it up or down in its holder; resist the
temptation to touch the main focus.